![]() Make the viewport narrower than is reasonable so it’s more obvious. If you have a really long page and can’t really figure out what the offending element is, try scrolling all the way to the right and scroll from the top to bottom and see if you can find any bits sticking out. Well, since you already have those Devtools open, that’s already starting on the solution, eh? A common cause is having items in your layout that are fixed width or have some min-width value that ends up larger than your viewport width at that point in time. Also, according to iOS resolution, even the iPhone 13 has a logical width of 390px, so dock those Devtools, I say. Or you could, I don’t know, ACTUALLY test on a narrow mobile device?įor what it’s worth, my phone is a Realme 3 Pro which is still happily chugging along, and it has a viewport width of 360px. So the tip here is, dock your Devtools for testing narrow viewports. If you dock your Devtools to the left or right of your viewport, then you can shrink the viewport down to near 0px if you really wanted to. That is, if you have your Devtools in a separate window. The last I checked, Firefox stops at 435px, Chrome stops at 500px and Safari stops at 559px. But did you test it at all?īut first, let’s go with the broad strokes situation of simply not testing at a narrow enough viewport. This is because there will inevitably be some edge cases where a trade-off needs to be made on whether to just let things be. Anyway, we thought it was worth a discussion, from why this phenomenon exists to how we can do our best to avoid it.Īs you can see, I have chosen the reasonably “loose” phrase “do our best”. Which is very different from intentional horizontal scrolling on mobile. I've only considered mapview for quick views of spatial data, and not for constructing maps that might have use as complex visualisation needing lots of fine control.My good friend, Wei, has a pet peeve: unintended horizontal over-scrolling on mobile. This should be applicable to your data.Īlternatively you might want to switch to a different mapping package, like tmap, which may have a bit more flexibility for web mapping. Now make a map of ID=1: mapview(ps) + mapview(ps, hide=TRUE)Īnd one of ID=2: mapview(ps) + mapview(ps, hide=TRUE)Īnd those maps should have the same extent. Now convert to a spatial data frame (ideally you'd also set the coordinate system here but everything defaults to lat-long so nm): library(sf) Then you can use all your points as a hidden map layer, and that sets the extent, and add the layer you want to see. You might be able to do this by converting your points to sf objects and then mapview lets you use hide=TRUE when you add map layers. Is there a option to add a header label for the map as well? It assumes a default bound, which varies each month depending on the max extent of the data in each month, which doesn't give me maps that I can compare. I would similarly want to plot the data for all 12 months, but I can't figure how to keep the x-y bounds for each of those 12 months similar. Mapview(jan, xcol = "Longitude", ycol = "Latitude", crs = 4269, grid = FALSE, col.regions="green") # plot the data for january ![]() Jan=x # separate out data by each month, to be plotted later as desired I am trying to plot occurrences in different months using the mapview () function x=ame(read.csv(file.choose())) # choose the original CSV file downloaded from ebird ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |